|
(Haslett, MI-September 16, 2008) The first round of what is likely to be a busy fall of
litigation regarding snowmobile access to Yellowstone this winter (2008-2009) has finished.
On September 15, 2008, District Judge Emmett Sullivan of the U.S. District Court for the
District of Columbia vacated the National Park Service’s December 13, 2007 Winter Use Rule,
which provided for recreational access to Yellowstone National Park by up to 540 best available
technology snowmobiles per day. He vacated the entire Winter Use Rule, apparently including
the snowcoach provisions as well as the snowmobile provisions. He did not put any substitute
rule in place and remanded the rule to the National Park Service, which can consider whether to
adopt a new rule.
Judge Sullivan’s ruling is only the latest in a long history of litigation surrounding the
Park Service’s Winter Use Rules for Yellowstone National Park, Grand Teton National Park, and
the John D. Rockefeller, Jr., Memorial Parkway. A second related case, challenging the Winter
Use Rule as being too restrictive of snowmobiling, is ongoing in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Wyoming.
While the International Snowmobile Manufacturers Association - ISMA, the American
Council of Snowmobile Associations - ACSA, and the Blue Ribbon Coalition - BRC strongly
object to Judge Sullivan’s ruling, they recognize that this ruling is not the last word on
Yellowstone winter use. Judge Sullivan’s ruling does not replace the vacated rule with any other
rule for the upcoming winter season, leaving open the issue on whether and how much
snowmobile access will be allowed. Oral argument in the related Wyoming litigation took place
before District Judge Clarence Brimmer in Cheyenne, Wyoming on the same day Judge Sullivan
issued his Order. ISMA, ACSA, and BRC are parties to that litigation as well, and intend to ask
the Court to reinstate the temporary rule that preceded the 2007 Winter Use Rule and allowed for
up to 720 recreational best available technology snowmobiles per day in Yellowstone.
Judge Sullivan’s ruling may ultimately result in there being no snowmobile or snowcoach
use in Yellowstone this winter, depending on the Park Service’s response, a possible appeal of
Judge Sullivan’s ruling, and the Wyoming litigation. At any rate, Judge Sullivan’s ruling
represents a radical departure from established legal principles and interpretations of governing
statutes. His broad-ranging and novel interpretations of the National Park Service Organic Act
and the Yellowstone National Park Act prohibit the Park Service from approving nearly any
visitor activity causing impacts to Natural Park resources. This has the potential to bar a broad
range of visitor activities in National Parks year round, including car, truck, RV, motorcycle, and
other motorized vehicle access during the Spring, Summer, and Fall months. It also has the
potential to do so throughout the Park System, not just in Yellowstone and Grand Teton National
Parks.
Finally, Judge Sullivan’s ruling ignores the long history of broad discretion for the Park
Service to balance conservation with visitor use and enjoyment in its management of the Park
System. By second-guessing the Park Service’s methodology for evaluating the impacts of the
rule, it also departs from the well-established legal principles requiring courts to defer to
governmental agencies’ scientific and technical judgments.
ISMA, ACSA, and BRC are dedicated to preserving snowmobilers’ access to federal
lands, including units of the National Park System. ISMA, ACSA, and BRC will continue to
pursue recreational snowmobile access to Yellowstone National Park.
|